福彩快三官方网站,澳门巴黎人有几个网站,大发手游网站,极速快三官网,盈彩,ca88唯一官网登录,凤凰彩票大厅

Home About us News center Products Innovation Careers
industry news
company news
industry news
media focus
video
Bans on polystyrene containers and single-use bags continue to spread
 
 
PLASTICS NEWS REPORT
Posted February 22, 2012
WASHINGTON (Feb. 22, 4:15 p.m. ET) -- Unless there is an unexpected reversal in a second vote, Dana Point, Calif., is set to become the 50th community in California to enact a ban on polystyrene takeout foodservice containers.

A second vote on the ban -- which would not be enforced until seven months after council approves the ban at a second reading -- is scheduled for March 6.

At the same meeting, Dana Point city council approved a ban on plastic bags, which also requires a second vote.

With Laguna Beach, Calif., also adopting a plastic bag ban earlier this month, that means 42 communities in California now have bans on single-use plastic carryout bags. Altogether, 54 cities and 12 counties in the U.S. have adopted plastic bag bans, three communities have taxes on plastic bags, and more than a dozen cities—including Austin, Texas; Sacramento and San Diego, Calif. — are actively pursuing plastic bag bans.

Forty-six cities and four counties in California have bans on PS takeout packaging. More than 80 percent of those communities are in the area between the Monterey Peninsula and the San Francisco-Oakland area, and most of them are coastal communities.

Further up the coast, there are PS bans in Seattle; Portland, Ore.; and Issaquah, Wash.

The Dana Point PS ban applies to all retail food vendors including grocery stores, delicatessens, food trucks and sidewalk vendors, and to all vendors at city facilities and city-sponsored, city-managed or city-permitted events. The ban on disposable PS foodservice ware includes containers, trays, cups, hinged or lidded containers, as well as other items designed for one-time use.

But it does not apply to single-use straws or utensils, to foods packaged in PS outside the city, or to PS packaging used for uncooked meat, fish, poultry or eggs.

The Laguna Beach plastic bag ban goes into effect next Jan. 1 and applies to all retail establishments. It requires retailers to charge at least 10 cent for paper bags, which will be required to have 40 percent post-consumer recycled content. There is no exemption in the law for restaurants.

The Millbrae plastic bag ban is scheduled to go into effect Sept. 1 for all retail establishments. Like the Laguna Beach ban, it also requires retailers to charge at least 10 cent for paper bags, which will be required to have 40 percent post-consumer recycled content.

However, restaurants, non-profit stores and dry cleaners are exempt from the Millbrae plastic bag ban. In addition, Millbrae merchants can hand out thicker reusable plastic bags, but they must have at least 40 percent post-consumer recycled materials, and state that fact on the bag.

According to the Sacramento-based Californians Against Waste, 16 percent of the people in California are now living in a jurisdiction where an ordinance has been passed banning plastic bags.

Earlier this month the city of San Francisco extended its now five-year-ban on plastic bags that to date has only applied to supermarkets and pharmacy chains to all retailers and food establishments in the city, effective Oct. 1.

The amended ordinance, approved Feb. 14, requires retailers to charge 10 cents for all paper and compostable bags handed out, also effective Oct. 1. However, restaurants will not be required to charge for paper bags given to customers for taking home food left over from sit-down dining.

The Save Plastic Bag Coalition has said it will file a lawsuit by mid-March against the extension of the San Francisco plastic bag ban to include food establishments.

The coalition also currently has a lawsuit against the San Luis Obispo Integrated Waste Management Authority, charging that they failed to conduct an environmental impact report as required by the California Environmental Quality Act prior to enacting the plastic bag ban for the county.

The Save the Plastic Bag Coalition also has appealed to the California Supreme Court the decision by the Marin County Superior Court that Marin County was not required to follow directives under CEQA requiring an EIR before the county enacted its plastic bag ban.

Earlier this month, in order to settle a lawsuit filed by the coalition, Santa Cruz County repealed the portion of its plastic bag ban that applied to restaurants and food vendors, effectively making them exempt from the ban.

Attorney Stephen Joseph, counsel for the coalition, has argued the California Retail Code pre-empts any local regulation or ban on plastic bags at restaurants and other food facilities.

According to Health and Safety Code 113705 of the state of California, “the public health interest requires that there be uniform statewide health and sanitation standards for retail food facilities to assure the people of this state that the food will be pure, safe, and unadulterated.”

 
About us
company profile
company culture
version and strategy
company history
certification
patents
contact
News center
company news
industry news
media focus
video
Products
products catalog
technical support
Innovation
create value
production line
QA&QC
new technique info
Copyright:King-Tech China Co.,Ltd
杭州市| 色达县| 当涂县| 潮安县| 衡阳县| 乐清市| 秦皇岛市| 祁连县| 河东区| 芦溪县| 吉隆县| 永年县| 梁平县| 驻马店市| 玉屏| 平舆县| 阿瓦提县| 灵川县| 北川| 三江| 神农架林区| 信宜市| 金华市| 尉犁县| 周口市| 卓尼县| 彭泽县| 德令哈市| 乳山市| 台北市| 古田县| 万安县| 通城县| 曲松县| 泰来县| 仙游县| 衡水市| 景洪市| 东城区| 濮阳县| 台南县|